Monday, 24 October 2011

Are we only, ...Holograms ?

The idea of a holographic universe isn’t new. It has been postulated by U.S. physicist Leonard Susskind and Dutch Nobel Prize physicist Gerard Hooft that the same principle that makes a two-dimensional image on a flat surface look three-dimensional could be applied to our entire universe...............!

Interestingly, why do our senses perceive reality in such a distinct way if we appear to be no more than shadows on a flat screen? The problem could be that our human eyes and our powerful "telescope lenses" conform to the reality of such a hologram of the rest of the universe.

The second point to consider is that our organic brain can also be found in the illusion, never being able to interpret a universe with a greater or fewer number of dimensions than can be perceived.
 
Karl Pribram, founder of the Center of Cerebral Research at the University of Radford in Virginia, thinks that our brains are holograms interpreting the hologram universe, mathematically constructing a reality interpreting frequencies that come from another dimension—a domain of significant reality that transcends time and space.

Nevertheless, the theory of a holographic universe of only two special dimensions conflicts with multi-dimensional theories arising from the roots of the superchord theory. Before this mark of a disparate hypothesis, many scientists already suspected that the universe is a hologram or illusion created by particles in the emptiness. However, all of the scientific efforts to comprehend the truth amid the mirage have become trapped in a frustrating array of unprovable theories.

Many vanguard theorists think that the disturbing breach in the field of quantum physics and relativity could explain historically argued phenomena in the scientific field, like those in which the mind doesn’t seem to be associated to the brain—such as near-death experiences, remote vision, and precognition.

Or, are we nuts in such a bewildered world of self-taught imagination just because we know far too much ?



No comments:

Post a Comment